LARE Section 4 study materials
LARE Section 4 study resources

LARE Section 4: Section 1 - Project and Construction Management

LARE Section 4 · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Section 1 - Project and Construction Management

Section 1 - Project and Construction Management

Section 1 tests how a landscape architect administers a project from contract execution through final acceptance: delivery method, procurement, cost and schedule control, and construction-phase documentation.

Delivery and procurement

  • Design–bid–build: the owner holds separate contracts with the designer and the contractor. The designer issues 100% construction documents and addenda, answers bidder questions, and evaluates bids for responsiveness and responsibility - not price alone.
  • Design–build and CM at risk compress schedule but shift design liability; the landscape architect may become a subconsultant to the builder.
  • Addenda are the only legal way to change bid documents, and each bidder must acknowledge them on the bid form.

Construction-phase roles

  • The landscape architect observes for conformance with the documents. Observation is not supervision: the contractor owns means, methods, sequencing, and site safety.
  • Submittals, shop drawings, samples, and mockups are reviewed for design intent only. RFIs are answered in writing; time or cost impacts route through the change-order process.
  • Pay applications are certified from observed percentages complete. Retainage is held per contract until substantial completion, which triggers warranties and the punch list.

Worked example

A contractor requests a change order for 1,200 SF of additional paving at the contract unit price of $9.50/SF plus 15% overhead and profit, and the owner deletes 400 SF of the same paving. Net cost = (1,200 × $9.50 × 1.15) − (400 × $9.50) = $13,110 − $3,800 = $9,310. The credit is taken at the contract unit price with no markup, because the contractor never performed that work.

Traps

  • Reading "lowest responsible bidder" as "lowest bid."
  • Accepting verbal direction from the owner as an authorized change.
  • Confusing the owner's construction contingency with the designer's fee.
  • Certifying a pay application without field verification.