FGR Oficial Investigador B study plan

Map the general part of criminal law (applicability of the criminal statute, theories of the offense, imputation, culpability, participation) into a structured outline covering every element tested on the FGR investigator exam.

Distinguish the categories of penalties, security measures, and extinction of criminal action and punishment, writing a one-page comparison table from memory.

Resolve 30 practice items on the general part, logging each error with the specific rule that was misapplied.

Explain in writing how concurso de delitos, iter criminis, and autoría mediata interact in a single hypothetical case.

Classify the specific offenses most relevant to federal investigation (organized crime, drug offenses, firearms, kidnapping, money laundering, human trafficking) by protected legal interest, elements, and penalty ranges.

Compare aggravated and attenuated variants of at least eight federal offenses and record the statutory basis for each distinction.

Draft short fact patterns and correctly subsume them under the applicable offense, citing elements rather than conclusions.

Answer 40 mixed specific-part items under timed conditions and score above 70 percent.

Sequence the stages of the acusatorio adversarial process from initial investigation through execution of sentence, identifying the procedural act that opens and closes each stage.

Differentiate the roles and powers of the Ministerio Público, the judge of control, the trial court, and the defense, producing a role matrix.

Explain the rules on evidence exclusion, legality of detention, and the hearing framework for formulating the imputation.

Solve 25 procedural items and justify each answer by naming the governing constitutional or statutory provision.

Analyze the constitutional and conventional standards on due process, presumption of innocence, and effective judicial protection, and apply them to three detention scenarios.

Identify the legal remedies available against acts of the Ministerio Público and against judicial rulings, and state the deadline and forum for each.

Evaluate the limits on pretrial detention and arraigo against human rights standards and write a reasoned position on a borderline case.

Complete a 30-item mixed set on procedural guarantees and control of legality with at least 75 percent correct.

Match each forensic discipline (ballistics, dactyloscopy, forensic genetics, toxicology, document examination, crime scene processing) to the type of evidence it produces and its evidentiary limits.

Describe the correct processing sequence of a crime scene and the packaging, labeling, and transfer rules that preserve the chain of custody.

Trace a simulated piece of evidence from collection to trial and document every link, identifying where the chain could be broken.

Draft a chain-of-custody record and an expert report summary that would withstand cross-examination.

Formulate an investigation plan that states hypotheses, lines of inquiry, and evidence-gathering steps for a given fact pattern.

Distinguish interview, interrogation, and witness statement, and apply the legal limits on each, including the prohibition of coercion and the right to counsel.

Practice structuring open-ended questions and detecting inconsistencies in a written transcript, producing a corrected interview guide.

Build a timeline and link chart from a set of case facts and identify the two most probative leads.

Summarize the constitutional framework of the security and justice system, including the distribution of federal and state competences relevant to FGR functions.

Identify the administrative obligations of the public servant (declarations, conflicts of interest, confidentiality) and the consequences of breach.

Classify disciplinary infractions by gravity and match each to its sanction and procedure using the applicable regime.

Analyze three ethics scenarios and resolve each with explicit reference to the governing norm.

Solve logical-verbal reasoning sets (analogies, syllogisms, sequencing, inference) under timed conditions and raise accuracy above 80 percent.

Apply analytical reading techniques to long legal texts and extract the holding, the rule, and the exception in under five minutes per text.

Run two full-length simulated exams covering all nine domains and review every missed item to root cause.

Consolidate a final one-page error digest of recurring weaknesses and the corrective rule for each.