The Boy Who Says He Is Eighteen
At 20:15 on a Tuesday, a ward police office receives a tenth-grade student brought in by a crowd after he snatched a mobile phone worth Rs 32,000 from a woman at a bus stop. Two other boys ran away. The phone is in his pocket. He says he is 18 and that "I will be out in a week anyway". His school identity card gives a date of birth that makes him 17 years and 2 months. There is no birth certificate and the ward office is closed. He is 168 cm tall with a light moustache. The complainant wants him "kept inside for a few days to teach him a lesson" and offers to withdraw the case if the phone is returned. The head constable wants to put him in the lock-up with two adult detainees arrested earlier for public drunkenness, and to handcuff him to the bench while the paperwork is done. The duty officer must decide before the 22:00 shift change.
1. Where should the boy be kept overnight, and what must happen within 24 hours? Give your reasoning.
Read the worked answer
Age first. Under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2075 a person below 18 is a child. The only documentary evidence available - the school identity card - points to 17 years 2 months; the boy's verbal claim and his height or moustache are not evidence. Where age is doubtful, the benefit goes to the child, not to the administration. He must therefore be treated as a child tonight.
Placement. A child may not be kept in a police lock-up with adult detainees. Putting him in with two drunk adults and handcuffing him to a bench is precisely the treatment the Act prohibits, and it would be the first thing a defence lawyer or a monitoring body would raise. The options are: release to parents or a responsible guardian on a written undertaking where the offence and the Act's schedule permit it, or, if he must be held, a place of safety separated from adults with an officer of the same sex on duty and the fact recorded.
Within 24 hours. Inform the parents or guardian, complete the apprehension memo and medical check, contact the prosecutor, and produce him before the Children's Bench of the district court by 20:15 on Wednesday. The Bench, not the police and not the complainant, decides custody and any correctional placement.
Record. Note the reasoning about his age in the file, because the decision will be reviewed.
2. What should be done the next morning to settle his age, and what may the police not do?
Read the worked answer
Permissible steps. (i) Obtain the birth registration from the ward office when it opens; (ii) obtain the school admission register, which usually records the birth certificate number used at admission; (iii) obtain a written statement from the parents and, if relevant, the hospital record; (iv) place all of it before the Children's Bench so that the court, not the police, records a finding on age.
Not permissible. Treating appearance, height, facial hair or a boastful statement as proof of adulthood; telling the boy that if he "admits" being 18 he will be released sooner; or running a bone-age test as a routine first step. A medical opinion on age is a last resort when no documentary evidence exists, not a substitute for the school register that is one day's delay away.
Why it matters practically. Age determines which court hears the case, which procedures apply, whether he can be kept in custody at all, and whether the record is confidential. A case tried in the wrong forum on a wrong age finding is the kind of procedural defect that overturns a conviction on appeal even where the snatching itself is proved by the recovered phone.
3. How should the duty officer answer the complainant's request and her offer to withdraw?
Read the worked answer
Explain the limits plainly. The complainant cannot decide whether a child is kept in custody, and she cannot "withdraw" a case that is now under investigation. What she can do is receive the phone back through a seizure-and-return memo signed by her, and give her statement.
On the phone. Seize it, list it, photograph it, note the IMEI, and return it on a receipt once it is no longer needed or under a court order - do not hand it over informally at the counter.
On "teach him a lesson". Say what the law actually does: the case goes to the Children's Bench, which has powers ranging from counselling and community service to a correction home, and the boy's record stays confidential. Holding him in an adult lock-up would not be a lesson; it would be a violation that damages the case and exposes the officers.
On settlement. Whether the matter can be compromised is for the court and depends on the offence; where the law allows it, a written compromise between the parties can be placed on the file, with the child's guardian present. The complainant should leave with a copy of her report, a receipt for the phone, and a realistic explanation of what happens next - not with a promise that the boy will be locked up.