NCEA L1 Health Studies study materials
NCEA L1 Health Studies study resources

NCEA L1 Health Studies study plan

NCEA L1 Health Studies · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 6 hours per week

Week 1

Wellbeing of individuals, whānau and communities

  • Define hauora and the four dimensions (taha tinana, taha hinengaro, taha whānau, taha wairua) in your own words and give one everyday example of each

  • Explain how the four dimensions interact, using at least two examples where a change in one dimension affects another

  • Distinguish between personal wellbeing and whānau/community wellbeing, and describe one situation where they overlap

  • Build a glossary of 15 key terms from Domain 1 with a one-sentence definition for each

Your checkpoint

A one-page concept map linking hauora dimensions to personal, whānau and community wellbeing, plus the 15-term glossary

Week 2

Wellbeing of individuals, whānau and communities

  • Describe at least three models or frameworks used to think about wellbeing (for example Te Whare Tapa Whā, Fonofale, or the socio-ecological model) and compare what each emphasises

  • Apply one wellbeing model to a realistic scenario involving a whānau and identify strengths and pressures in that scenario

  • Explain the concept of health equity and give two examples of groups in Aotearoa New Zealand that experience poorer health outcomes

  • Summarise how culture and identity contribute to wellbeing, with reference to at least one specific example

Your checkpoint

A 400-word written response applying one wellbeing model to a scenario, including a short equity discussion

Week 3

Wellbeing of individuals, whānau and communities & Factors that influence the health of individuals, whānau and communities

  • List and explain at least six factors that influence health (for example income, housing, education, employment, social connection, access to services, environment, discrimination)

  • Classify each factor as individual, whānau or community level, and justify each classification

  • Describe how at least two factors interact to compound disadvantage, using a concrete example

  • Begin a factors table that will be extended in later weeks

Your checkpoint

A completed factors table with at least six factors, their level, a justification and one example each

Week 4

Factors that influence the health of individuals, whānau and communities

  • Explain the difference between modifiable and non-modifiable determinants of health and sort ten determinants into each category

  • Describe how the social, economic, cultural and political environment shapes health outcomes, with one example per environment

  • Analyse a real public health issue in Aotearoa New Zealand and identify the determinants driving it

  • Evaluate which determinants in that issue are most amenable to change and explain why

Your checkpoint

A 500-word determinants analysis of one public health issue, with a labelled diagram of contributing factors

Week 5

Factors that influence the health of individuals, whānau and communities & Health-related inquiry, assessment and decision-making

  • Identify the steps of a health-related inquiry: defining the question, gathering evidence, assessing credibility, interpreting findings, and making a recommendation

  • Write three inquiry questions about a health issue and judge which is most answerable and why

  • Locate and evaluate two sources of health information for credibility, recency and bias

  • Describe how the Treaty of Waitangi principles (partnership, participation, protection) apply to health inquiry and decision-making

Your checkpoint

A source evaluation sheet comparing two sources on the same health issue, with a credibility judgement and justification

Week 6

Health-related inquiry, assessment and decision-making

  • Collect and organise evidence relevant to your chosen health issue, recording where each piece of evidence came from

  • Interpret data or findings and state what they show, what they do not show, and what remains uncertain

  • Identify at least two different stakeholder perspectives on the issue and summarise each fairly

  • Draft a health-promoting recommendation and justify it with evidence

Your checkpoint

An evidence portfolio with at least five sources, a summary of findings and a draft recommendation

Week 7

Health-related inquiry, assessment and decision-making

  • Evaluate the strengths and limitations of your own recommendation, including possible unintended consequences

  • Explain how ethical considerations (consent, confidentiality, cultural safety) affect health-related decision-making

  • Compare two possible courses of action and justify which you would choose using explicit criteria

  • Revise your recommendation so that it is specific, feasible and evidence-based

Your checkpoint

A 600-word decision-making report containing the recommendation, criteria, comparison of options and ethical considerations

Week 8

Wellbeing of individuals, whānau and communities & Factors that influence the health of individuals, whānau and communities & Health-related inquiry, assessment and decision-making

  • Synthesise the three domains by explaining how wellbeing, determinants and inquiry connect in one integrated example

  • Complete two timed practice responses under exam conditions and self-mark against the achievement criteria

  • Review your glossary and factors table, filling any gaps identified during practice

  • Identify your three weakest areas and write a short action plan for further revision

Your checkpoint

Two timed practice responses plus a one-page revision action plan listing remaining gaps

Milestones

Week 2: You can explain hauora and at least one wellbeing model from memory, and apply it to an unfamiliar whānau scenario without notes

Week 4: You can name at least eight determinants of health, classify them by level, and explain how two or more interact to affect outcomes

Week 6: You have an evidence portfolio with at least five evaluated sources and a draft evidence-based recommendation

Week 8: You have completed two timed practice responses and can state your three weakest areas with a plan to address them