Two letters about one boundary wall
Two letters reach the naib-tehsildar's office on the same morning. The first, from a shopkeeper, was written in Urdu and has been rendered into English by the junior clerk as follows: 'The applicant requests that the wall of the government school in front of his shop is falling on his goods and the concerned officer should be ordered to remove it immediately otherwise he will be compelled to take legal action and also his uncle is a retired patwari who says the wall is on his land. Please do the needful.' The second is from the school's headmaster: the wall is the school's boundary wall, built in 2011 on land recorded in the school's name; the shopkeeper has pushed his display shelves four feet into the school compound, and his goods lean on the wall, which is why the plaster is failing. The tehsildar is on leave, a reply must be despatched today, both parties have threatened to call the press, and the clerk has drafted: 'Your complaint has been received and the same is under process. You are directed to wait for further order and do not do anything illegal.'
1. Separate the disputed facts from the mere assertions in the two letters. Which factual questions must be answered before any officer acts, and which two documents would settle most of them?
Read the worked answer
Disputed facts that decide the case:
- Where is the boundary? The shopkeeper asserts the wall stands on 'his land'; the headmaster says it is the school's wall on school land. The question is the position of the line on the ground, not the condition of the plaster.
- Who is in possession of what? If shelves stand four feet inside the school compound, the falling plaster is a consequence of the shopkeeper's own encroachment, and the complainant is the school.
- Is the wall dangerous? That is an engineering question for an inspection, not for a reply letter.
Two documents that settle most of it:
- The khasra/jama-bandi with the school's mutation entry and the 2011 construction record: who is recorded, for what area, on which side of the line.
- The patwari's field book (shajra kishtwar) together with a spot inspection/demarcation: the field book ties the khasra number to the map, and demarcation fixes the line on the ground if the parties dispute the map. Dated photographs and measurements from a fixed point complete the picture.
What is not evidence: the retired patwari uncle's opinion. Hearsay from a relative with a departmental background is exactly the kind of influence that should be excluded courteously and in writing; the reply should mention that documents, not opinions, will be considered. The word 'immediately' in the first letter is the complainant's clock, not the office's.
2. Identify the defects in the clerk's draft and rewrite it as a formal reply of roughly 60–70 words that promises a process, not an outcome.
Read the worked answer
Defects in the draft:
- No identity or reference. It names no complaint, no khasra, no date. With two letters arriving together, 'your complaint' is unusable.
- No accountable officer and no timeframe. 'Under process' tells the writer nothing and guarantees a follow-up call or a press call within the week.
- A threat where a duty belongs. 'Do not do anything illegal' hints that the office suspects the complainant and is vague enough to be read as an instruction to keep quiet.
- It answers nothing. It neither acknowledges the school's account nor states what will be verified.
Rewrite (66 words): 'Reference your complaint dated ___ regarding the boundary wall of Government Boys Primary School, Khasra 214/3. The matter is entered in the office diary at Serial No. ___. A spot inspection with the halqa patwari, and a comparison of the school's record with the field book, will be held on ___ at 10:00 a.m.; please attend with any documents you rely on. The position will be communicated in writing within fifteen days. Neither party should alter the site in the meantime.'
Note what the rewrite does: it identifies the file, fixes a date, names the officer's method, imposes one neutral restraint on both sides, and promises a written decision in fifteen days without promising which way it will go.
3. Explain why 'do the needful' and 'immediately' are the wrong register for an official reply. How would you deal with the uncle's claim and with the press threat?
Read the worked answer
Why the register matters. 'Do the needful' asks an officer to exercise favour, not to decide according to law; a public office owes a decision on the record, not a discretionary kindness. 'Immediately' is the complainant's word, and adopting it commits the office to a deadline it cannot lawfully meet - notice, inspection, record verification all take time - and will be quoted back at the office later. The correct register is specific, checkable and silent on outcome: 'verified on [date]; position communicated within fifteen days.'
The uncle's claim. Acknowledge in the reply that information has been received, then record that the boundary will be determined from the revenue record and the spot, not from statements of interested persons; invite any documents he holds to be filed in writing, with a copy to the school. This is courteous, keeps the file clean, and forecloses the later allegation that influence was at work.
The press threat. It is answered by the file, not by the letter. A file showing a diary number, a notice, a scheduled inspection and a written reply is a complete defence; a file showing a threatening note to a complainant is not. Where both parties threaten publicity, the safe course is to reply to both on the same day, in the same form, and to keep the language neutral in both - asymmetry between the two replies is what a reporter looks for.