SC General Contractor study materials
SC General Contractor study resources

900K Award on a 250K Line of Credit

SC General Contractor · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

$900K Award on a $250K Line of Credit

You own a general contracting firm with $250,000 available on a line of credit - your only source of liquidity, and the bank reviews the balance every quarter. A repeat client awards you a $900,000, six-month interior renovation. Terms: bill monthly by the 25th; 10% retainage, dropping to 5% once the project passes 50% complete; the owner pays 45 days after billing, which in practice means cash arrives two months after the work month; all project costs are paid in the month incurred; cost of work runs 85% of gross billings. Anticipated gross billings: M1 $150,000; M2 $200,000; M3 $200,000; M4 $180,000; M5 $120,000; M6 $50,000. Retainage is released 30 days after final acceptance. Your bookkeeper flags the exposure before you sign.

1. Compute the peak working-capital requirement month by month. Does the line of credit cover it?

Read the worked answer

Retainage: 10% on M1–M3 (the project crosses 50%, $450,000, during M3), 5% on M4–M6.

Month Gross Retainage Net billing Cost (85%)
M1 150,000 15,000 135,000 127,500
M2 200,000 20,000 180,000 170,000
M3 200,000 20,000 180,000 170,000
M4 180,000 9,000 171,000 153,000
M5 120,000 6,000 114,000 102,000
M6 50,000 2,500 47,500 42,500

Receipts lag two months: M3 collects M1's $135,000, M4 collects $180,000, and so on.

Cumulative cash: M1 −127,500; M2 −297,500; M3 −332,500; M4 −305,500; M5 −227,500; M6 −99,000; M7 +15,000; M8 +62,500, plus $72,500 retainage later.

Peak deficit is $332,500 at the end of M3 - about $82,500 beyond the line. The job is profitable but unfundable as written. The killer is the combination of a two-month collection lag and the front-loaded cost curve, not the retainage alone.

2. Rank three realistic mitigations and explain why each works on the cash curve rather than just on paper.

Read the worked answer
  1. Shorten the collection cycle. Weekly or biweekly billing with a 20-day pay cycle pulls roughly $150,000–$180,000 of receipts forward by 3–4 weeks, which is exactly the size of the gap. This is the highest-value move because it attacks the lag directly and costs nothing but paperwork discipline.
  2. Negotiate a mobilization payment or advance of 10% against the first billing. $90,000 up front offsets M1 and M2, the two months with no receipts at all. Owners resist this; offer a matching reduction in later billings and a bond if required.
  3. Reduce retainage to 5% throughout, or post a retainage bond in lieu of retainage. Saves about $27,500 of held cash during M1–M3.

Stretch subcontractor payment terms only as far as prompt-pay statutes allow - in many states paying subs later than the owner pays you is itself a violation, and it converts a financing problem into a lien problem. Front-loading the schedule of values to manufacture cash is a defect, not a strategy: it invites a fraudulent-billing allegation and a surety claim.

3. The owner counters: 5% retainage throughout, but payment at 60 days and a pay-when-paid clause. Accept, counter, or walk?

Read the worked answer

Run the trade. Dropping retainage to 5% throughout frees about $27,500 during M1–M3. Moving from 45 to 60 days pushes every receipt out roughly half a month; with average net monthly billings near $154,000 that is a ~$75,000 deeper hole - the owner's offer is net negative by roughly $45,000–$50,000 and deepens the exact month-three trough that already breaks the LOC.

Pay-when-paid does not fix it either: it shifts risk to your subs and may be unenforceable or illegal if the clause conditions payment on owner payment beyond a statutory period. It also does nothing for your own labor and material costs, which are paid in the month incurred.

Counter. Keep 5% retainage but hold the 45-day clock, or take 60 days with a 10% mobilization payment and biweekly billing. If the owner won't move on the payment clock, take a smaller scope or a phased start - do not sign a contract whose cash curve exceeds your liquidity, because the first late payment then cascades into missed payroll and a bonded default.