ENADE História study plan

ENADE História · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 6 hours per week

Week 1

Enade Bacharelados e Cursos Superiores de Tecnologia

Map the full Enade Bacharelados/Tecnólogos exam structure by writing a one-page outline of its sections, item types, and scoring logic.
Draft a personal diagnostic by answering 20 mixed-format practice items and logging which competencies failed.
Build a glossary of 15 core assessment terms (competência, habilidade, objeto de conhecimento) with your own definitions.

A one-page exam map plus a scored diagnostic log of 20 items with error categories.

Week 2

Interpret the formative and summative purposes of Enade by writing a 300-word comparison of how each purpose shapes preparation.
Analyze how the exam articulates general formation and specific professional formation by classifying 10 sample items accordingly.
Practice reading long contextualized stems by completing 15 items under a 90-second-per-item limit.

A classification table of 10 items by general vs. specific formation with justification notes.

Week 3

Explain the Enamed framework and its emphasis on medical education competencies by producing a structured summary.
Compare Enamed's competency orientation with the general Enade model in a two-column chart.
Solve 15 practice items on health, society, and professional practice, recording reasoning for each answer.

A comparative chart of Enamed vs. Enade competency models plus a 15-item reasoning log.

Week 4

Review weeks 1-3 error logs and rewrite every missed item's rationale correctly.
Draft integrative answers linking health policy content to broader social-determination arguments.
Time a 25-item mixed set from domains 1 and 2 at exam pace.

A corrected error portfolio of at least 20 rewritten rationales.

Week 5

Outline the Enade das Licenciaturas structure, emphasizing teacher formation and pedagogical practice.
Analyze the relationship between theory and practice in teacher education by writing a 400-word argument with examples.
Classify 12 practice items by pedagogical competency and flag ambiguous ones.

A 12-item competency classification sheet with an argumentative essay of at least 400 words.

Week 6

Connect licensure-domain pedagogical content to general-formation themes in a concept map.
Practice writing structured discursive responses to 5 open-ended prompts within time limits.
Peer-review or self-review two discursive answers against a self-built rubric.

Five timed discursive responses scored against a personal rubric.

Week 7

Simulate a full-length mixed exam under real timing conditions.
Score the simulation and rank weak competencies across all three domains.
Re-study the two weakest competencies using targeted summaries and 10 new items each.

A simulation score report with a ranked weakness list and remediation notes.

Week 8

Consolidate all three domains into a single one-page review sheet of key concepts and argument templates.
Re-attempt previously missed items and verify at least 80 percent accuracy.
Rehearse time allocation and answer-checking routines in a final 20-item sprint.

A final one-page synthesis sheet plus a re-attempt accuracy report of at least 80 percent.

Week 4: Complete the domain 1 and 2 error portfolio and score at least 60 percent on a timed 25-item mixed set.

Week 6: Submit five timed discursive responses and demonstrate a clear competency-classification rationale for each.

Week 8: Achieve at least 80 percent accuracy on re-attempted items and finish the one-page synthesis sheet covering all three domains.