The Caregiver Who Promised
Mrs. K is 81 and cares for her husband, 84, who has moderate Alzheimer's disease. He wanders at night, is incontinent, and has left the house twice while she showered; police returned him once. She manages all his medications and ADLs and has not seen her own physician in two years. She says she is "fine" but cries intermittently, has lost 12 pounds unintentionally, and sleeps about four hours a night. Their only son lives abroad. Their income is Social Security plus a small pension; they have Medicare and a Medigap plan, no Medicaid. She refuses to discuss residential placement: "I promised him I would never put him in a home."
1. What are you assessing, and how do you separate caregiver strain from a safety concern?
Read the worked answer
Assess three layers separately, because they trigger different responses.
1. Mrs. K's own health - screen with a validated tool (e.g., Zarit Burden Interview) plus PHQ-9. Twelve pounds of unintentional weight loss, nightly four-hour sleep, and intermittent crying are clinical findings, not background color. She is an undiagnosed patient in this dyad, and if she decompensates, the entire care arrangement collapses.
2. The husband's safety - nighttime wandering with two elopements and one police return is a supervision failure, not a behavior problem. Also assess driving, firearms, stove use, medication self-administration, and door alarms. Ask directly about any hitting, restraining, or yelling during personal care - that is a genuine mistreatment screen, and the answer changes my obligation.
3. Their finances - Medicare plus Medigap without Medicaid sharply limits in-home options; knowing this before suggesting them prevents offering help that does not exist.
Distinction that matters: caregiver burden is a support problem; unsupervised wandering with repeated elopement is a safety problem. Both are present, and I address them with different tools. I also need to know my state's mandatory reporting threshold for vulnerable adults - inability to provide supervision is not the same as abuse, and I do not report reflexively, but I do not let fear of the report stop me from asking.
2. She refuses placement. What do you offer, and how do you frame it?
Read the worked answer
Reframe the intervention: she is not choosing between home and a facility, she is choosing between home alone and home with help. "I'm not asking you to break a promise. I'm asking what it would take to keep it."
Concrete supports to bring to her:
- In-home aide for personal care and bathing a few mornings a week - the shower is exactly when he eloped.
- Adult day program two days a week - supervision plus a predictable rest for her.
- Door alarms, a wandering-registry bracelet (e.g., MedicAlert with the Alzheimer's Association Safe Return program), and a GPS-enabled device.
- Respite care, plus the Alzheimer's Association helpline (available 24/7) and a caregiver support group.
- Benefits screening: if he is a veteran, VA aid and attendance could fund in-home help; if not, check state home- and community-based programs even without full Medicaid eligibility.
- A scheduled appointment with her physician.
Negotiate one thing, not everything. Ask which of these she would accept this week. Agree on a written crisis plan for the next elopement: who to call, what to do, what triggers a revisit of the decision.
Reasoning: a blanket refusal of "placement" is not a refusal of all help. Splitting the request is how self-determination and safety coexist.
3. What planning is missing that would matter if something happened to Mrs. K?
Read the worked answer
Right now the entire care system is one 81-year-old woman, with no backup. If she is hospitalized, breaks a hip, or dies, her husband has no identified caregiver, no accessible plan, and a son on another continent.
What I put in place now, while both are stable:
- Advance care planning for Mr. K, including a health care proxy and documented wishes while he can still participate; confirm any existing powers of attorney and guardianship documents are current and physically accessible.
- A named emergency caregiver - the son reached and listed as a contact authorized to make decisions, plus who physically arrives in the first 24 hours.
- A written crisis plan posted in the home and in the chart: who to call for an elopement, how to get him safely supervised, and which facility the family would accept if placement became unavoidable.
- Consolidated information - medication list, providers, insurance details - in one place the son can find it.
- A documented trigger for escalation. Decide in advance what event moves the plan from "home with supports" to a higher level of care, so the decision is made calmly rather than in an emergency department at 2 a.m.
Reasoning: this is contingency planning, not placement advocacy. It also protects Mrs. K's autonomy - she is choosing an arrangement, and she should know what happens to it if she is unavailable.