Aragón PAU History of Philosophy study materials
Aragón PAU History of Philosophy study resources

Aragón PAU History of Philosophy study plan

Aragón PAU History of Philosophy · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 6 hours per week

Week 1

Ancient and Medieval Philosophy: Plato and Aristotle

  • Map the Platonic corpus relevant to PAU: list the allegory of the cave (Republic VII), the divided line, the theory of Forms, and the soul's tripartition, citing the passage numbers you will quote in an exam

  • Reconstruct Plato's argument that opinion differs from knowledge by writing it out as a numbered premise-conclusion chain in your own words

  • Define 12 core Platonic terms in Spanish (idea/eidos, participación, reminiscencia, dialéctica, opinión, ciencia) with one exam-ready sentence each

  • Draft a 200-word answer to 'Explain the meaning of the cave allegory' without consulting notes, then correct it against your source text

Your checkpoint

A one-page Plato concept sheet plus a timed 200-word cave-allegory answer scored against a 4-point rubric you write yourself

Week 2

Ancient and Medieval Philosophy: Plato and Aristotle

  • Compare Aristotle's four causes with Plato's Forms by building a two-column table that names where each thinker locates the source of intelligibility

  • Explain hylomorphism, potency/act, and the unmoved mover in a single coherent paragraph linking them causally

  • Identify three standard exam prompts on Aristotle and outline each in five bullet points

  • Distinguish Aristotle's virtues as a mean from Platonic virtue-as-knowledge in 150 words

Your checkpoint

A comparative Plato–Aristotle essay of 400 words answering a real PAU-style prompt, written in 45 minutes under exam conditions

Week 3

Modern Philosophy: Descartes and Hume

  • Trace Descartes' route from hyperbolic doubt to cogito to the existence of God as a numbered argumentative sequence

  • Separate the three types of idea (innate, adventitious, factitious) and state which one carries the proof of God

  • Explain the Cartesian circle objection and write your own short reply to it

  • List the differences between Cartesian dualism and Hume's bundle theory before studying Hume, as a prediction you will later test

Your checkpoint

A labelled argument map of the Meditations (doubt → cogito → God → world) on one page, with every inferential step named

Week 4

Modern Philosophy: Descartes and Hume

  • Reconstruct Hume's fork (relations of ideas vs matters of fact) and apply it to two claims of your own choosing

  • Explain causation as constant conjunction and habit, and state precisely what Hume denies we perceive

  • Contrast Hume's empiricist account of personal identity with Descartes' substantial self in 200 words

  • Answer three short-answer questions on Descartes and Hume in 10 minutes each, closed book

Your checkpoint

A closed-book mock section (one Descartes essay outline plus three Hume short answers) scored against the official-style rubric, with a written list of every gap found

Week 5

Modern Philosophy: Kant

  • Explain the Copernican turn: why Kant claims objects must conform to our cognition, in your own words with an example

  • Distinguish analytic/synthetic and a priori/a posteriori, and place the synthetic a priori in the resulting grid

  • State the three questions of the first Critique and how the transcendental dialectic answers them

  • Formulate two objections to Kant's transcendental idealism and one Kantian reply to each

Your checkpoint

A filled 2×2 classification grid with five worked examples per cell and a 250-word explanation of why synthetic a priori judgements are possible

Week 6

Contemporary Philosophy: Nietzsche, Marx, and existentialism

  • Reconstruct Marx's base/superstructure and alienation arguments as premise chains, naming the Hegelian move he inverts

  • Explain Nietzsche's master/slave morality, will to power, and eternal recurrence, and show how they connect

  • Summarise the existentialist response (freedom, anguish, bad faith) and identify which Nietzschean theme it inherits

  • Draft a 300-word comparison of Marx and Nietzsche on the origin of values

Your checkpoint

One comparative essay (350 words) on Marx and Nietzsche plus a glossary of 15 terms from domains 3–4 with exam-ready definitions

Week 7

Contemporary Philosophy: Ortega y Gasset and Spanish thought & Text commentary and philosophical analysis: concepts, arguments, and contextualization

  • State Ortega's 'I am I and my circumstance', the distinction between ideas and beliefs, and perspectivism, each in one precise sentence

  • Place Ortega against his German sources (Kant, Husserl, Heidegger) and against the Generation of '14 context

  • Practise the four-step commentary method (contextualise, summarise, analyse concepts and arguments, evaluate) on an unseen text fragment

  • Time a full commentary to the exam's allotted minutes and mark your own weaknesses

Your checkpoint

Two complete text commentaries written under time pressure (one on Ortega, one on a fragment from domain 1 or 3), each with an explicit evaluation section

Week 8

Text commentary and philosophical analysis: concepts, arguments, and contextualization & Ancient and Medieval Philosophy: Plato and Aristotle & Modern Philosophy: Descartes and Hume & Modern Philosophy: Kant & Contemporary Philosophy: Nietzsche, Marx, and existentialism & Contemporary Philosophy: Ortega y Gasset and Spanish thought

  • Run two full timed mock exams covering all six domains and score them strictly against the rubric

  • Rewrite your three weakest answers from memory until each meets the rubric's top band

  • Consolidate a single one-page timeline linking every author to their period, key work, and central problem

  • Rehearse standard connective phrases in Spanish for contextualisation, comparison, and critical evaluation

Your checkpoint

A scored mock-exam portfolio with a one-page master timeline and a short written self-assessment naming the two topics you will review on exam morning

Milestones

Week 2: Can write a 400-word Plato or Aristotle essay in 45 minutes with correct technical vocabulary and at least one direct textual reference

Week 4: Can reproduce the Descartes and Hume argument chains from memory and answer short questions on either without notes

Week 6: Can explain Kant, Marx, and Nietzsche in a single sitting and defend one objection to each

Week 8: Scores at or above your target band on two full timed mocks, with no domain left unrehearsed