Aragón PAU History of Philosophy study plan
Aragón PAU History of Philosophy · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
Ancient and Medieval Philosophy: Plato and Aristotle
Map the Platonic corpus relevant to PAU: list the allegory of the cave (Republic VII), the divided line, the theory of Forms, and the soul's tripartition, citing the passage numbers you will quote in an exam
Reconstruct Plato's argument that opinion differs from knowledge by writing it out as a numbered premise-conclusion chain in your own words
Define 12 core Platonic terms in Spanish (idea/eidos, participación, reminiscencia, dialéctica, opinión, ciencia) with one exam-ready sentence each
Draft a 200-word answer to 'Explain the meaning of the cave allegory' without consulting notes, then correct it against your source text
Your checkpoint
A one-page Plato concept sheet plus a timed 200-word cave-allegory answer scored against a 4-point rubric you write yourself
Ancient and Medieval Philosophy: Plato and Aristotle
Compare Aristotle's four causes with Plato's Forms by building a two-column table that names where each thinker locates the source of intelligibility
Explain hylomorphism, potency/act, and the unmoved mover in a single coherent paragraph linking them causally
Identify three standard exam prompts on Aristotle and outline each in five bullet points
Distinguish Aristotle's virtues as a mean from Platonic virtue-as-knowledge in 150 words
Your checkpoint
A comparative Plato–Aristotle essay of 400 words answering a real PAU-style prompt, written in 45 minutes under exam conditions
Modern Philosophy: Descartes and Hume
Trace Descartes' route from hyperbolic doubt to cogito to the existence of God as a numbered argumentative sequence
Separate the three types of idea (innate, adventitious, factitious) and state which one carries the proof of God
Explain the Cartesian circle objection and write your own short reply to it
List the differences between Cartesian dualism and Hume's bundle theory before studying Hume, as a prediction you will later test
Your checkpoint
A labelled argument map of the Meditations (doubt → cogito → God → world) on one page, with every inferential step named
Modern Philosophy: Descartes and Hume
Reconstruct Hume's fork (relations of ideas vs matters of fact) and apply it to two claims of your own choosing
Explain causation as constant conjunction and habit, and state precisely what Hume denies we perceive
Contrast Hume's empiricist account of personal identity with Descartes' substantial self in 200 words
Answer three short-answer questions on Descartes and Hume in 10 minutes each, closed book
Your checkpoint
A closed-book mock section (one Descartes essay outline plus three Hume short answers) scored against the official-style rubric, with a written list of every gap found
Modern Philosophy: Kant
Explain the Copernican turn: why Kant claims objects must conform to our cognition, in your own words with an example
Distinguish analytic/synthetic and a priori/a posteriori, and place the synthetic a priori in the resulting grid
State the three questions of the first Critique and how the transcendental dialectic answers them
Formulate two objections to Kant's transcendental idealism and one Kantian reply to each
Your checkpoint
A filled 2×2 classification grid with five worked examples per cell and a 250-word explanation of why synthetic a priori judgements are possible
Contemporary Philosophy: Nietzsche, Marx, and existentialism
Reconstruct Marx's base/superstructure and alienation arguments as premise chains, naming the Hegelian move he inverts
Explain Nietzsche's master/slave morality, will to power, and eternal recurrence, and show how they connect
Summarise the existentialist response (freedom, anguish, bad faith) and identify which Nietzschean theme it inherits
Draft a 300-word comparison of Marx and Nietzsche on the origin of values
Your checkpoint
One comparative essay (350 words) on Marx and Nietzsche plus a glossary of 15 terms from domains 3–4 with exam-ready definitions
Contemporary Philosophy: Ortega y Gasset and Spanish thought & Text commentary and philosophical analysis: concepts, arguments, and contextualization
State Ortega's 'I am I and my circumstance', the distinction between ideas and beliefs, and perspectivism, each in one precise sentence
Place Ortega against his German sources (Kant, Husserl, Heidegger) and against the Generation of '14 context
Practise the four-step commentary method (contextualise, summarise, analyse concepts and arguments, evaluate) on an unseen text fragment
Time a full commentary to the exam's allotted minutes and mark your own weaknesses
Your checkpoint
Two complete text commentaries written under time pressure (one on Ortega, one on a fragment from domain 1 or 3), each with an explicit evaluation section
Text commentary and philosophical analysis: concepts, arguments, and contextualization & Ancient and Medieval Philosophy: Plato and Aristotle & Modern Philosophy: Descartes and Hume & Modern Philosophy: Kant & Contemporary Philosophy: Nietzsche, Marx, and existentialism & Contemporary Philosophy: Ortega y Gasset and Spanish thought
Run two full timed mock exams covering all six domains and score them strictly against the rubric
Rewrite your three weakest answers from memory until each meets the rubric's top band
Consolidate a single one-page timeline linking every author to their period, key work, and central problem
Rehearse standard connective phrases in Spanish for contextualisation, comparison, and critical evaluation
Your checkpoint
A scored mock-exam portfolio with a one-page master timeline and a short written self-assessment naming the two topics you will review on exam morning
Milestones
Week 2: Can write a 400-word Plato or Aristotle essay in 45 minutes with correct technical vocabulary and at least one direct textual reference
Week 4: Can reproduce the Descartes and Hume argument chains from memory and answer short questions on either without notes
Week 6: Can explain Kant, Marx, and Nietzsche in a single sitting and defend one objection to each
Week 8: Scores at or above your target band on two full timed mocks, with no domain left unrehearsed