Arsenic pump, broken toilets and 27 diarrhoea cases in six weeks
A block health officer reviews six weeks of data from a revenue village of 60 households (312 people, including 41 children under five). Of three hand pumps, the one nearest to 30 households has just tested at 0.11 mg/L arsenic against a standard of 0.05 mg/L; the other two are safe, but one is 400 m away across a highway and the third serves the school. Twenty-two households still practise open defecation. The community toilet block has six of eight pans broken, no water connection, and a gate that is locked after 8 p.m. Under-five diarrhoea cases recorded at the sub-centre rose from 8 to 27 in six weeks; ORS use at home is about 30%. The village leader has publicly demanded a new tube well and has collected signatures. The sanitation department's budget for this quarter can fund either a new well or the toilet block repairs plus chlorination of the school pump - not both. A local NGO offers hygiene education but no funds.
1. Using the data given, set priorities for the quarter and justify where the leader's demand ranks.
Read the worked answer
Ranking:
- Toilet block repair, water connection and opening hours. Twenty-two households openly defecating, with a non-functional block and a locked gate, is the most direct route to the diarrhoea rise. Twenty-seven cases in six weeks among 41 under-fives is a roughly 3.4-fold increase, and this fix is fast and fundable.
- Safe water for the 30 arsenic-exposed households. Arsenic is a slow, largely irreversible risk, so a quarter's delay in a new well is tolerable only if a safe alternative is arranged now - directing those households to the two safe pumps, plus storage for those who cannot walk twice a day.
- ORS and care-seeking at home. 30% ORS use is a cheap gap to close during the same household visits, alongside zinc.
- The new tube well. It addresses convenience and status more than the current disease burden, and it cannot be built alongside the repairs. Say so openly and put it into next quarter's proposal with a siting survey, which is a commitment rather than a refusal.
Reasoning: rank by burden, reversibility and cost per case averted, not by the volume of the demand. The leader's signatures are a real political constraint, so the answer must give him a dated next step, not a closed door.
2. Draft a six-week action plan with two measurable indicators and state who does what.
Read the worked answer
Weeks and tasks
- Week 1: joint inspection with the panchayat; order pans and the water line; agree a caretaker and opening hours with the leader; chlorinate and test the school pump; map the 30 arsenic-exposed households.
- Week 2: repairs completed and block reopened; chlorination repeated; check ORS and zinc stock at the sub-centre and with the ASHA.
- Weeks 2–5: household visits by ASHA plus NGO volunteer across all 60 households - ORS demonstration, handwashing with soap at the toilet and before food, safe water storage; targeted visit to the 30 households with a pump map. School session in week 3.
- Weeks 3–6: fortnightly diarrhoea line-list from the sub-centre.
- Week 6: review with the panchayat and the leader.
Indicators
- Under-five diarrhoea cases fall from the current four to five per week to two or fewer by week 6, with reported ORS use at home rising from 30% to at least 70% (checked by household recall, not stock issue).
- All 22 open-defecation households are within 100 m of a working pan with water, and none of the 30 arsenic-exposed households is still using the nearest pump as its main drinking source - verified by spot checks at two different times of day, because a single morning visit will miss households that fill at dusk.
3. How would you communicate the arsenic risk so households stop using the nearest pump, without causing panic or losing trust?
Read the worked answer
Lead with the test, not with the word 'poison'. Show the paper result, the standard (0.05 mg/L) and the reading (0.11), and state plainly what is known: arsenic has no taste, colour or smell, so a family cannot detect it, and the effects appear after years, mainly skin changes and internal effects. That framing explains why the pump feels fine and still must not be used for drinking.
Give a same-day alternative. 'This pump is for washing and cleaning. Drinking and cooking water comes from these two pumps.' Name them, give the walking distance honestly (400 m, across the highway), mark a safe crossing point, and ask the school to allow use of its pump at set hours. For households that cannot walk twice a day, arrange storage - that is what prevents relapse.
Protect credibility. Test in front of people if a field kit is available and let the leader's group nominate two witnesses. Do not claim the new well is unnecessary; say it is not fundable this quarter and will be surveyed for the next. If an earlier promise to this village was broken, acknowledge it. Follow up at two weeks and target individually anyone still using the pump. Panic comes from a danger with no alternative; a clear alternative with a clear rule keeps the message calm and usable.