TKP study plan
TKP · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Pelayanan Publik (Public Service Orientation) & Integritas (Integrity)
Map the 8 exam domains against your current confidence and write a one-page baseline self-assessment with a score from 1 to 5 for each domain
Define pelayanan publik in your own words and list the core service principles (transparency, accountability, responsiveness, equality, fairness) with one concrete workplace example each
Distinguish integrity from mere rule-following by writing three short scenarios where the honest choice is costly and explaining the reasoning
Build a personal glossary of 20 Indonesian exam terms (pelayanan, integritas, jejaring, radikalisme, prestasi) with definitions you can recall without notes
Your checkpoint
A one-page baseline diagnostic sheet scoring all 8 domains plus a 20-term glossary
Pelayanan Publik (Public Service Orientation)
Analyze at least six public-service case scenarios and classify which service principle is violated and what the correct response would be
Draft a step-by-step service recovery procedure for a citizen whose request was mishandled, covering apology, correction, and follow-up
Compare good versus poor frontline service behaviors by writing 10 paired examples (one effective, one ineffective) and the reason for each judgment
Practice 30 timed pelayanan publik questions and log every wrong answer with the underlying principle you missed
Your checkpoint
A 30-question practice log with error analysis and a written service recovery procedure
Integritas (Integrity)
Identify the main forms of integrity failure in public office (conflict of interest, gratifikasi, nepotism, falsifying records) and write a detection cue for each
Apply a four-step ethical decision framework (identify stakeholders, weigh duties, check rules, choose and justify) to five dilemma scenarios
Write a personal integrity commitment statement of 150 words describing what you will refuse to do and why
Answer 30 timed integrity questions and explain each error in one sentence
Your checkpoint
A five-scenario ethical reasoning write-up plus a personal integrity commitment statement
Semangat Berprestasi (Achievement Motivation) & Profesionalisme (Professionalism)
Define achievement motivation in behavioral terms and list eight observable indicators (setting stretch targets, seeking feedback, persisting after failure, improving processes)
Set three specific, measurable 4-week personal improvement targets for your weakest domains and define how you will verify each
Describe the components of professionalism (competence, discipline, responsibility, ethics, continuous learning) with one work example per component
Complete 40 mixed questions from domains 1, 5, 7, and 8 under timed conditions and record accuracy by domain
Your checkpoint
A mid-program mock score report by domain plus three written improvement targets with verification methods
Semangat Berprestasi (Achievement Motivation)
Rewrite three past setbacks as learning narratives showing initiative and persistence rather than blame
Design a personal feedback routine (weekly self-review questions, one source of external feedback) and run it once this week
Analyze five scenario questions where the correct answer reflects proactive improvement over passive compliance, and articulate the distinguishing cue
Solve 30 achievement-motivation questions and reduce repeats of the same error type to zero
Your checkpoint
A written self-review log for one week plus three setback-to-learning narratives
Jejaring Kerja (Networking and Collaboration) & Sosial Budaya (Social and Cultural Awareness)
Map your stakeholder network and identify five collaboration opportunities, stating the mutual benefit for each
Practice conflict handling by writing responses to four disagreement scenarios using a listen-clarify-propose-agree structure
Explain the practical value of social and cultural awareness (empathy, avoiding stereotypes, adapting communication) with four workplace examples
Answer 30 questions from domains 2 and 3 and label each error as knowledge gap or misread question
Your checkpoint
A stakeholder and collaboration map plus four written conflict-response scripts
Anti-Radikalisme (Counter-Radicalism) & Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi (ICT Proficiency)
Distinguish radicalism from legitimate criticism and religious or political conservatism using five comparison examples
List early-warning indicators of radicalization (intolerance of difference, rejection of dialogue, us-versus-them framing) and describe appropriate non-confrontational responses
Demonstrate core ICT skills relevant to public service: secure handling of citizen data, verifying information before sharing, and using official channels
Answer 30 questions from domains 4 and 6 and note which answers depended on terminology versus judgment
Your checkpoint
A one-page counter-radicalism response guide plus a data-handling checklist
Pelayanan Publik (Public Service Orientation) & Integritas (Integrity) & Semangat Berprestasi (Achievement Motivation)
Take two full timed mock exams and record accuracy per domain against your week-1 baseline
Re-teach your three weakest sub-topics aloud or in writing without notes to confirm retention
Review every logged error from weeks 1 through 7 and confirm you can state the correct reasoning before moving on
Finalize a one-page exam-day strategy covering time allocation, question triage, and handling of uncertain items
Your checkpoint
Two mock exam score reports with a final error review sheet and a one-page exam-day strategy
Milestones
Week 2: Can explain all public-service principles and correctly classify 5 of 6 case scenarios without notes
Week 4: Timed mixed mock accuracy of at least 70 percent, with integrity and public service at or above that level
Week 6: Can articulate collaboration and cultural-awareness responses to four scenarios and identify all early-warning indicators of radicalization
Week 8: Final mock accuracy of at least 80 percent overall with no domain below 70 percent, and every logged error reviewed