SLIA Part III study plan
SLIA Part III · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Architectural Practice and Professional Conduct & Building Law, Statutory Approvals and Institute Regulation
Map the full scope of Architectural Practice and Professional Conduct into a one-page competency grid, tagging each sub-area as strong, shaky, or unknown
Distinguish the architect's statutory duties from contractual duties by writing a comparison table of at least eight obligations with the source of each
Summarise the Institute's disciplinary and professional-conduct framework, including grounds for complaint and likely sanctions, in your own words
Draft a personal ethics decision checklist for conflicts of interest, advertising, and competence boundaries
Your checkpoint
A two-page conduct-and-statutory-duty reference sheet, self-scored against the competency grid, with at least five gaps flagged for later review
Building Law, Statutory Approvals and Institute Regulation
Trace the statutory approval pathway for a typical building project from submission through to occupation, listing each authority, application type, and typical turnaround
Explain the roles of the building official, the qualified person, and the developer in the approval chain and where liability sits
Build a table of common non-compliance triggers and the corrective action each demands
Recite from memory the key statutory definitions that govern approval scope and exemptions
Your checkpoint
A one-page approval-flow diagram plus a 20-row compliance-trigger table, both written without reference to notes
Building Law, Statutory Approvals and Institute Regulation & Architectural Practice and Professional Conduct
Compare the Institute's regulatory powers with the statutory regulator's powers, identifying overlap and where one prevails
Analyse three hypothetical conduct scenarios and decide the correct forum, process, and outcome for each
List the documentation an architect must retain to defend professional-conduct and statutory-compliance decisions
Identify the appeal and review routes available when an approval is refused or a complaint is upheld
Your checkpoint
Three written scenario analyses (300 words each) with a reasoned decision and the governing rule cited for each
Project Management and Contract Administration
Select the appropriate standard form of contract for four project profiles and justify each choice in two sentences
Map the contract administrator's duties across the project lifecycle, from award to final account
Explain how variations, extensions of time, and delay claims are valued and certified under a standard form
Distinguish the certifier's role from the designer's role when instructions conflict with design intent
Your checkpoint
A contract-selection matrix for four project profiles plus a one-page lifecycle duty map, self-marked against the source documents
Project Management and Contract Administration
Draft a realistic project programme with milestones, dependencies, and a critical path for a mid-size project
Prepare a cost plan and cash-flow forecast and reconcile them against the programme
Write three model contract letters: an instruction, a request for further particulars, and a notice of delay
Describe how progress meetings, site inspections, and payment certification interlock to control time and cost
Your checkpoint
A programme, cost plan, and cash-flow forecast for one project, plus three drafted contract letters, all cross-checked for internal consistency
Design, Technology and Professional Competence & Project Management and Contract Administration
Explain the performance requirements behind fire, structural, and accessibility provisions and how they drive design decisions
Evaluate three construction detailing options against buildability, durability, and maintenance criteria
Identify the coordination failures most likely to cause defects and describe the inspection regime that catches them
Apply a quality-management sequence from design review through to handover and defects liability
Your checkpoint
A defect-risk register of at least 15 items, each with a cause, a design-stage control, and a site-stage inspection point
Design, Technology and Professional Competence & Architectural Practice and Professional Conduct
Define the boundaries of your own competence and state when to decline, refer, or bring in a specialist
Summarise current sustainability and energy-performance obligations and their effect on design and approval
Integrate professional-conduct duties into design decision-making using two worked examples
Explain how technical failures become conduct matters and what records protect the architect
Your checkpoint
A two-page competence-and-escalation statement plus two worked examples linking a technical decision to a conduct duty
Architectural Practice and Professional Conduct & Building Law, Statutory Approvals and Institute Regulation & Project Management and Contract Administration & Design, Technology and Professional Competence
Sit two full timed mock papers under exam conditions and record scores by domain
Re-teach every missed question from first principles rather than memorising the answer
Revisit the week 1 competency grid and confirm every flagged gap is now closed or consciously accepted
Rehearse a 10-minute verbal walkthrough of a project covering approvals, contract, and design risk
Your checkpoint
Two completed mock papers with a scored error log, plus a closed-out competency grid showing every domain at or above target
Milestones
Week 2: Can explain the statutory approval pathway end to end, naming each authority and application type, without notes
Week 4: Can justify a contract choice and outline the administrator's duties across the full lifecycle in under 10 minutes
Week 6: Mock score in Domains 3 and 4 at or above 60 percent, with every error logged against a specific gap
Week 8: Both full mock papers completed within time, all four domains at or above 65 percent, and the competency grid showing no unresolved red flags