SLIA Part III study materials
SLIA Part III study resources

SLIA Part III study plan

SLIA Part III · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 7 hours per week

Week 1

Architectural Practice and Professional Conduct & Building Law, Statutory Approvals and Institute Regulation

  • Map the full scope of Architectural Practice and Professional Conduct into a one-page competency grid, tagging each sub-area as strong, shaky, or unknown

  • Distinguish the architect's statutory duties from contractual duties by writing a comparison table of at least eight obligations with the source of each

  • Summarise the Institute's disciplinary and professional-conduct framework, including grounds for complaint and likely sanctions, in your own words

  • Draft a personal ethics decision checklist for conflicts of interest, advertising, and competence boundaries

Your checkpoint

A two-page conduct-and-statutory-duty reference sheet, self-scored against the competency grid, with at least five gaps flagged for later review

Week 2

Building Law, Statutory Approvals and Institute Regulation

  • Trace the statutory approval pathway for a typical building project from submission through to occupation, listing each authority, application type, and typical turnaround

  • Explain the roles of the building official, the qualified person, and the developer in the approval chain and where liability sits

  • Build a table of common non-compliance triggers and the corrective action each demands

  • Recite from memory the key statutory definitions that govern approval scope and exemptions

Your checkpoint

A one-page approval-flow diagram plus a 20-row compliance-trigger table, both written without reference to notes

Week 3

Building Law, Statutory Approvals and Institute Regulation & Architectural Practice and Professional Conduct

  • Compare the Institute's regulatory powers with the statutory regulator's powers, identifying overlap and where one prevails

  • Analyse three hypothetical conduct scenarios and decide the correct forum, process, and outcome for each

  • List the documentation an architect must retain to defend professional-conduct and statutory-compliance decisions

  • Identify the appeal and review routes available when an approval is refused or a complaint is upheld

Your checkpoint

Three written scenario analyses (300 words each) with a reasoned decision and the governing rule cited for each

Week 4

Project Management and Contract Administration

  • Select the appropriate standard form of contract for four project profiles and justify each choice in two sentences

  • Map the contract administrator's duties across the project lifecycle, from award to final account

  • Explain how variations, extensions of time, and delay claims are valued and certified under a standard form

  • Distinguish the certifier's role from the designer's role when instructions conflict with design intent

Your checkpoint

A contract-selection matrix for four project profiles plus a one-page lifecycle duty map, self-marked against the source documents

Week 5

Project Management and Contract Administration

  • Draft a realistic project programme with milestones, dependencies, and a critical path for a mid-size project

  • Prepare a cost plan and cash-flow forecast and reconcile them against the programme

  • Write three model contract letters: an instruction, a request for further particulars, and a notice of delay

  • Describe how progress meetings, site inspections, and payment certification interlock to control time and cost

Your checkpoint

A programme, cost plan, and cash-flow forecast for one project, plus three drafted contract letters, all cross-checked for internal consistency

Week 6

Design, Technology and Professional Competence & Project Management and Contract Administration

  • Explain the performance requirements behind fire, structural, and accessibility provisions and how they drive design decisions

  • Evaluate three construction detailing options against buildability, durability, and maintenance criteria

  • Identify the coordination failures most likely to cause defects and describe the inspection regime that catches them

  • Apply a quality-management sequence from design review through to handover and defects liability

Your checkpoint

A defect-risk register of at least 15 items, each with a cause, a design-stage control, and a site-stage inspection point

Week 7

Design, Technology and Professional Competence & Architectural Practice and Professional Conduct

  • Define the boundaries of your own competence and state when to decline, refer, or bring in a specialist

  • Summarise current sustainability and energy-performance obligations and their effect on design and approval

  • Integrate professional-conduct duties into design decision-making using two worked examples

  • Explain how technical failures become conduct matters and what records protect the architect

Your checkpoint

A two-page competence-and-escalation statement plus two worked examples linking a technical decision to a conduct duty

Week 8

Architectural Practice and Professional Conduct & Building Law, Statutory Approvals and Institute Regulation & Project Management and Contract Administration & Design, Technology and Professional Competence

  • Sit two full timed mock papers under exam conditions and record scores by domain

  • Re-teach every missed question from first principles rather than memorising the answer

  • Revisit the week 1 competency grid and confirm every flagged gap is now closed or consciously accepted

  • Rehearse a 10-minute verbal walkthrough of a project covering approvals, contract, and design risk

Your checkpoint

Two completed mock papers with a scored error log, plus a closed-out competency grid showing every domain at or above target

Milestones

Week 2: Can explain the statutory approval pathway end to end, naming each authority and application type, without notes

Week 4: Can justify a contract choice and outline the administrator's duties across the full lifecycle in under 10 minutes

Week 6: Mock score in Domains 3 and 4 at or above 60 percent, with every error logged against a specific gap

Week 8: Both full mock papers completed within time, all four domains at or above 65 percent, and the competency grid showing no unresolved red flags