CNSF Actuario Daños study materials
CNSF Actuario Daños study resources

CNSF Actuario Daños study plan

CNSF Actuario Daños · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 7 hours per week

Week 1

Matemáticas actuariales y teoría del riesgo & Modelado de frecuencia y severidad de siniestros

  • Derive and apply the collective risk model (compound Poisson, Panjer recursion) to compute aggregate loss distributions by hand for small portfolios

  • Distinguish frequency distributions (Poisson, negative binomial, binomial) and select the appropriate one for overdispersed claim counts using variance-to-mean diagnostics

  • Fit severity distributions (lognormal, gamma, Pareto, Weibull) to a sample of claim amounts and estimate parameters by maximum likelihood, interpreting tail behavior

  • Explain the effect of deductibles, policy limits and coinsurance on the severity distribution and compute limited expected values

Your checkpoint

A one-page worked solution set (with formulas and numeric answers) covering one aggregate loss calculation, one frequency selection with justification, and one severity fit with parameter estimates and tail comparison

Week 2

Matemáticas actuariales y teoría del riesgo & Modelado de frecuencia y severidad de siniestros

  • Compute VaR and TVaR for fitted loss distributions and compare their behavior in the tail

  • Apply credibility theory (Bühlmann, Bühlmann-Straub) to blend portfolio and insured experience

  • Estimate loss trends and apply trend factors to frequency and severity separately, documenting assumptions

  • Build a frequency-severity simulation in a spreadsheet or script and validate output against analytic results

Your checkpoint

A short technical note (2-3 pages) presenting a simulated aggregate loss distribution with VaR/TVaR at 99% and 99.5%, reconciled against the analytic approximation

Week 3

Tarificación y suscripción en seguros de daños & Reservas técnicas y estimación de siniestros pendientes

  • Construct a gross rate for a commercial property or liability line from pure premium, expense load, profit and contingency margin, and verify the balance equation

  • Differentiate rating variables that are actuarially justified from those that create unfair discrimination risk

  • Calculate incurred-but-not-reported (IBNR) reserves using chain-ladder and Bornhuetter-Ferguson on a development triangle, and reconcile the two estimates

  • Identify reserve adequacy indicators and describe how case reserves, IBNR and ULAE interact in the technical reserve

Your checkpoint

A completed development triangle exercise with chain-ladder and Bornhuetter-Ferguson IBNR estimates, a reconciliation paragraph explaining the difference, and a rate build-up table showing all loadings

Week 4

Marco legal y regulatorio de seguros de daños en México & Solvencia, capital regulatorio y gestión de riesgos (ERS)

  • Map the key obligations of the Ley de Instituciones de Seguros y de Fianzas (LISF) and Circular Única de Seguros y Fianzas to actuarial practice areas (pricing, reserving, solvency, reporting)

  • Explain the structure of the régimen de solvencia: required solvency capital, minimum paid-in capital, and the calculation bases for each

  • Describe the role of the Comisión Nacional de Seguros y Fianzas (CNSF) in authorization, supervision and intervention

  • Outline the requirements and governance expectations of the external actuarial audit and the responsible actuary figure

Your checkpoint

A regulatory map (table or diagram) linking at least 12 LISF/CUSF obligations to the actuarial function they constrain, each with a one-line practical implication for a daños actuary

Week 5

Solvencia, capital regulatorio y gestión de riesgos (ERS) & Reaseguro y transferencia de riesgo

  • Compute the required solvency capital for a sample daños portfolio under the regulatory formula and compare it to economic capital from a VaR approach

  • Apply proportional, excess-of-loss and stop-loss treaties to a loss sample and quantify ceded losses, retained losses and reinsurance recovery

  • Explain the effect of reinsurance on solvency capital, reserve credit and counterparty risk under the regulatory framework

  • Draft the core elements of an ORSA narrative: risk appetite, own risk assessment, capital projection and stress scenarios

Your checkpoint

A solvency and reinsurance memo (3-4 pages) with a capital calculation table, a treaty comparison showing ceded vs retained results, and a stress-test section with at least two scenarios

Week 6

Solvencia, capital regulatorio y gestión de riesgos (ERS) & Inversiones, activos y gestión de portafolio

  • Identify the risk categories of the enterprise risk management (ERS) framework and assign at least two concrete daños-specific risks to each

  • Build a risk register with likelihood, impact, mitigation and owner for a hypothetical insurer

  • Evaluate investment portfolio constraints for technical reserves: matching of duration and currency, eligible assets, diversification and liquidity limits

  • Compute duration, modified duration and convexity for a sample bond portfolio and interpret interest-rate sensitivity

Your checkpoint

A risk register plus asset-liability summary showing portfolio duration against reserve duration, with a written recommendation on matching gaps

Week 7

Ética profesional y normativa de conducta & Reportes regulatorios y comunicación de resultados técnicos

  • Apply the professional code of conduct to three realistic dilemmas (conflicting data requests, pressure to understate reserves, use of confidential information) and justify the chosen action

  • Draft the sections of a quarterly regulatory report: reserve movements, solvency position, reinsurance program and variance explanations

  • Translate technical results into a one-page executive summary for a non-actuarial board audience without losing accuracy

  • Identify the documentation and audit-trail standards expected for actuarial assumptions and model changes

Your checkpoint

A mock quarterly technical report (4-5 pages) including reserve and solvency sections, an executive summary, and a documented resolution of one ethical dilemma

Week 8

Marco legal y regulatorio de seguros de daños en México & Tarificación y suscripción en seguros de daños & Reservas técnicas y estimación de siniestros pendientes

  • Consolidate weak areas by re-solving missed problems from weeks 1-7 under timed conditions

  • Complete two full-length timed practice sets spanning all ten domains and record accuracy by domain

  • Review the regulatory and ethical content most likely to be tested in short-answer form

  • Build a personal formula and definitions sheet limited to what can be recalled in the exam

Your checkpoint

A scored diagnostic report by domain from two timed practice sets, plus a finalized one-page formula and definitions sheet

Milestones

Week 2: Can compute VaR and TVaR for a fitted severity distribution and explain in writing why TVaR is preferred for tail risk, without notes

Week 4: Can state the main LISF/CUSF obligations for pricing, reserving, solvency and reporting, and compute the required solvency capital for a simple portfolio unaided

Week 6: Can produce a risk register and a duration-matching recommendation for a sample balance sheet within 45 minutes, with no calculation errors on duration

Week 8: Scores at least 70% overall on both timed practice sets, with no domain below 60% and at least 75% on domains 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7