NZ Certifying Drainlayer study materials
NZ Certifying Drainlayer study resources

Café grease trap and stormwater discharge proposal

NZ Certifying Drainlayer · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Café grease trap and stormwater discharge proposal

A 140-seat café is fitting out in an existing building. The only drainage connection is a 100 mm foul drain to the public main; the council trade waste bylaw requires pre-treatment for FOG and a sampling point, with annual desludging. The tenant proposes a 35 L grease trap under the sink and discharging the rest to stormwater because "it's only dishwater". There is no room in the tenancy for a large interceptor; a shared alcove in the rear service court is available.

1. Assess the tenant's proposal against the trade waste and drainage requirements.

Read the worked answer

The proposal fails on two counts.

First, discharging commercial kitchen wastewater to stormwater is not permitted. Trade waste must go to the foul sewer via the approved pre-treatment system; stormwater is for unpolluted roof and surface water only. Connecting kitchen waste to stormwater is a prohibited cross-connection and a pollution risk.

Second, a 35 L under-sink trap is domestic-scale and is not sized for a 140-seat café. Grease interceptor sizing must follow the council trade waste code and AS/NZS 3500.2, based on the fixtures, flow and FOG load - not on the space available. An undersized trap will pass grease to the sewer, cause blockages and breach the trade waste bylaw.

A trade waste consent/approval is required before connection, and the pre-treatment and sampling point must be shown on the drainage plan.

2. Propose a compliant pre-treatment and connection arrangement using the available space.

Read the worked answer

Use the rear service court for a properly sized external grease interceptor, subject to council approval:

  • size the interceptor from the café's fixture load and the council trade waste code, not from the tenancy footprint;
  • run the kitchen waste in a dedicated gravity line to the interceptor, with adequate grade and access for desludging;
  • provide a sampling point downstream of the interceptor and before the connection to the public main, in an accessible position;
  • ventilate the interceptor and maintain trap seals; provide a suitable access cover and traffic/load rating if vehicles use the court;
  • keep stormwater separate and do not connect any kitchen fixture to it;
  • confirm the connection point, levels and capacity of the existing 100 mm foul drain with the territorial authority.

If a shared interceptor is proposed, the ownership, maintenance and cost-sharing arrangements must be documented and accepted by the council.

3. What commissioning and ongoing records should be in place?

Read the worked answer

At completion:

  • trade waste consent/approval and the approved drainage plan showing the interceptor and sampling point;
  • interceptor sizing calculation and manufacturer's installation instructions;
  • test results for the kitchen waste line and confirmation that stormwater and foul are separate;
  • commissioning record: interceptor filled and checked, sampling point accessible, no leaks, ventilation working;
  • as-built levels and locations, plus photographs before covering.

Ongoing:

  • a maintenance contract or schedule for desludging at the council-required frequency (at least annually, or more often if the FOG load requires);
  • records of every desludge and waste disposal;
  • staff instructions on what must not go to the drain (fats, oils, solids);
  • the record of work/certification and handover information to the café owner.