The Two Endings of a Short Story: Which Reading Is Best Supported?
A student reads a short story in which a boy waits at a train station for a father who has promised to come. The final paragraph says: 'The train whistled twice and left. The boy kept looking at the empty rails, then folded the letter and put it in his pocket.' The student writes: 'The ending proves the father will never come, so the boy is destroyed.' A classmate disagrees, saying the ending only shows the boy waiting and that we cannot know what happens next. The teacher notes that earlier the narrator mentioned the boy had folded and unfolded the letter 'eleven times' during the afternoon, and that the letter was 'short and cheerful.' The exam asks students to justify an interpretation using textual evidence, not personal feeling.
1. Which interpretation is better supported, and what textual evidence decides it? Justify using at least two details.
Read the worked answer
The classmate's reading is better supported. The text gives no statement that the father will never come; it only reports a departure and a gesture. The boy keeps looking at the rails, which signals continued expectation rather than confirmed loss. The detail that he folded the letter 'eleven times' shows anxious repetition, not despair. The letter being 'short and cheerful' undercuts the claim that the boy is 'destroyed.' A defensible answer must separate what the text states from what the reader infers; the student's 'proves' and 'destroyed' are inferences presented as facts, so the evidence does not support them.
2. Rewrite the student's sentence so it states an interpretation without overclaiming.
Read the worked answer
A careful rewrite replaces absolute claims with hedged, evidence-anchored ones, e.g.: 'The ending suggests the boy's disappointment: the train leaves without his father, and his repeated folding of the letter hints at anxiety, though the text leaves his future open.' The rewrite (1) drops 'proves' in favour of 'suggests,' (2) names the textual detail (the departing train, the folded letter), and (3) admits uncertainty rather than asserting 'destroyed.' The point of the task is that literary judgement is graded on whether claims are proportionate to evidence.