Military Academy Belgrade Entrance Exam case studies
Military Academy Belgrade Entrance Exam · Put your knowledge to work in context.
The Military Academy Belgrade entrance exam is the competitive admission assessment for candidates seeking a cadet place at Serbia's Military Academy (Vojna akademija) in Belgrade. It is intended for secondary-school graduates who meet the Academy's general and medical eligibility conditions and who want to train as officers in the Serbian Armed Forces. The Military Academy Belgrade Entrance Exam case studies are 5 cases and about 1,707 words.
1Range Safety and Projectile Motion at the Academy Field
A cadet candidate is evaluated on a physics problem during the entrance exam. A small training projectile is launched from ground level at 20 m/s at an angle of 30° above the horizontal over flat terrain.
376 words, about 2 min2Reading a Short Serbian Lyric and Its Figurative Language
A candidate receives a short anonymous Serbian lyric in the entrance exam (paraphrased here so no published text is reproduced): the speaker says the dawn 'washes the rooftops with cold silver' and that 'my word walks barefoot through the town.' The examiner asks three things: to identify the dominant figures of speech, to explain how the imagery shifts from the first clause to the second, and to decide whether the tone is more likely celebratory or elegiac, given only the internal evidence. The candidate is warned that there is no single memorized answer; credit depends on matching claims to textual evidence.
342 words, about 2 min3Scheduling a Fitness Test Under Medical Constraints
A candidate reports for the physical fitness assessment. Screening notes: resting heart rate 92 bpm, a mild asthma diagnosis (uses an inhaler before exercise), and a recent ankle sprain three weeks ago that is still slightly swollen.
358 words, about 2 min4Seating and Fairness Decision in a Written Reasoning Section
During the logical reasoning section, an invigilator notices that candidate A and candidate B, seated adjacent, have identical wrong answers on several items, including an unusual distractor. Candidate A's paper shows erasure marks and a changed answer on item 7; candidate B's paper is clean.
337 words, about 2 min5Psychological Screening: Interpreting a Candidate's Answers
In a psychological screening interview, a candidate for a physically demanding military program answers a stress-tolerance questionnaire. He scores high on 'persistence' but also high on 'reluctance to seek help' and reports that he 'never tells anyone when something is wrong.' He describes one episode: during a prior injury he hid the pain to finish a team event, and his team later praised him.
294 words, about 1 min