Schleswig-Holstein ESA English study materials
Schleswig-Holstein ESA English study resources

Schleswig-Holstein ESA English: Medienkompetenz und KI im Englischunterricht

Schleswig-Holstein ESA English · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Medienkompetenz und KI im Englischunterricht

This domain tests critical, ethical and pedagogical use of AI and digital media in English teaching. It is not about knowing the newest tool; it is about designing tasks in which learners use AI transparently, evaluate outputs and keep ownership of their thinking.

Core rules

  • AI literacy: learners should understand what a language model does, what it cannot know, and why outputs can be fluent but wrong, biased or culturally stereotyped.
  • Prompt literacy: a prompt needs role, audience, purpose, constraints and format. Learners should compare outputs from changed prompts and explain the differences.
  • Verification: AI output is a draft to be checked against criteria, sources and register, not an authority.
  • Transparency: declare AI use in process evidence; assessment should require planning notes, drafts, reflection or oral defence.
  • Data protection: no personal data, learner names or sensitive school information in public AI tools; follow SH rules and school policy.
  • Copyright and academic honesty: AI-generated text is not automatically the learner’s own achievement.

Worked example

Learners must write a formal email to a host family. First they prompt an AI tool: “Write a formal email to a host family introducing yourself, 120 words, polite register.” Then they evaluate the output against a checklist: Does it include all required information? Is the register consistently formal? Are there cultural clichés? They mark errors and rewrite the email in their own words. Reasoning: the AI output becomes a text to critique, not a model answer. This develops reading, register awareness and revision, while keeping the final product accountable to the learner.

Traps that cost marks

  • Assuming AI output is correct because it is fluent.
  • Using AI to grade learner texts without checking bias, consistency and data protection.
  • Allowing AI-generated final products while assessing them as independent writing.
  • Prompting without context, then blaming the tool for a generic answer.
  • Ignoring cultural stereotypes and hallucinated facts in AI-generated texts.